Well, after a lot of headaches here it is http://www.draculasystems.com. Far by being perfect at least its not a cheat.[:D]

Well Henry, u could say anything u want, it is ur opinion and i respect it. Still one thing disturbs me: after i have clearly specified in site that it does not cheat in any way - it is not using hidsight functions, it is not buying on the same bar at the open or something similar, no forward references, also clearly explain how one could find if a system is cheating (playing with x axes loaded periods) - here u come and say that it could cheat. Maby from where u come or for u something like that its usual but u should not asume that everywhere its the same. U have just made me a liar and it is not nice, however again especially for u: it does not cheat.

$603 for just one system - well i guess at this price u could buy 60 systems with 100% return/year at $10 i am sure that if u search the net u will find even more than 60, my system is just one and yes its $603, one is free to choose after how its brain dictates, $603 and if u ask me its way under the real value of my sustained work/efforts and achieved results.

Black box password protected - now this is something that i undersand but what can i do...i will not reveal such a method, even tough i do not consider it spectacular just yet, if i could improve it it will really be spectacular...however its not that simple.

i am really sorry for ur tone and the way u have put the problem. wish u all the best.

Hey Minnamor,

a) not enough capital

b) read the first page within my site, a little above the discalimer. Average non compounded achieved %/year

c)long

d) u really did not look carefully. Tests were made from 1993.

e) read the first page within my site, a little above the discalimer

f) same as e)

g) last chart presented in every page is from a montecarlo simulation

Really? i did not knew. I think the best thing to do is ignore u and u ignore me.

I wish u good luck and profitable trading.

hey *pp..... couple questions if ya have the time and it doesn't reveal anything you prefer not to.........

1 .... what's the reason for the "any portfolio of securities that you want as long as it contains over 100 securities," statement in paragraph 2 .... here in the states some of us trade just the qqqq's , spyders , diamonds and such.... will it not work on single securitys?.....

2... both the nasdaq and nas 100 tests commence from the bottom of the bear market, which is of course ok, but what is the deal with " 26% Annualized Compounded Interest Rate " ..... if that is refering to interest paid while funds are dormant, have you ran tests with out an interest parameter...... reread everything several times but i may be still missing the answer.....

should add here, i'm not familar with tradesim at all......h

1. fairly simple, if u try to trade only a few securities it will not generate enough trades.

2. if u start with 100000 and u achieve 250000 within aproximately 1610 days it means that u have gained a compounded interest of aprox. 23%. Compounded interest is calculated after the following formula: PV(1+rate)power 365/n = FV formula from where u will get rate =((FV/PV) power 365/n -1), where

PV present value in our case 100000 the initial capital

FV future value wich is 250000 the finishing capital

rate - interest rate

Yes u are right about starting at the begining of the trend, that was because from 2000 peak the market index lost more than 55% which means that it lost around 11% anualized compounded interest rate. My strategy traded from the begining of 2000 gained around 11-12% compounded interest.

U don`t have to be familiar with tradesim to know that H, those are required things to know because else one does not have any ideea about what resonabel means.

Any questions are welcomed and answered as long as they are adressed in a proper way.

*PP :)

It seems that posting a trading system with his results is a huge mistake. From what i see the majority has absolutly no ideea about what a resonable gain means and how one could know if his results are good or bad. Everyone has different expectations from the market and unfortunately it seems that those expectations are anything but realistic. Personal here is how i see the things: in the last 10-15 years the market indexs (US) gained around 8-11% compounded interest.A strategy with 20% compounded interest over those years is more than resonable. To achieve this results a strategy must take the folowing path: it must win aproximately the same amount as the market index, puls or minus somehing, in positive years and it must protect u from losing as much as the market index in bad years. This is what i consider to be resonable and worth pursuing.

Everyone is free to have his/hers own expectations from this trading thing. I saw a lot of claims about 100% return /year, now... i hope that one really understands what that means. 100% / year and 100000 strating capital would make u richer than the richest man on the planet in about 20 years. U think that this is a resonable expectation? i don`t. And even if in one particular year is possible for a trading strategy to achieve 100% return that is due to the fact that it has been traded in a very good year. I don`t claim that achieving 100% return/year is impossible but if one can do that then to compare his strategy with holy grail would be an ofense for his strategy.

I really don`t know how my strategy will perform in the following years. It may be not worth pursuing, it may yield better results than those shown in tests, what i know is the following thing: statisticaly it has above 50% wins and a average win/loss above 1. It is equivalent with playing a game in which you will win for example $1.01 lets say 51% of time and lose $1.00 49% of time. Mathematicaly that is positive...of course its not exactly that simple but just as an example. Now my biggest concern is not if this strategy will win, because if statistics are any good then in time the result will be positive, but the extent in which it will be profitable...