Dear Henry1224, I want to ask you the following: You have select a huge Amount of Formulas into the Sub-Sector, Formulae Collection. I quiet believe that everyone that use this Forum will be grateful to you. I want to please you to answer me to the following: Do you believe that you can assortment more the Formulas? I mean can you assortment in the way that, Formulaes which have Date expression inside it, to put them in a different Sub-Folder, inside the Sub-Sector Formulae Collection ? George K.

Dear George K, Just to let you know what I'm up to, I will try to implement different Add-ons into more systems. A hint for users! Create one expert, and then add all of the variations of that expert this way you can have more that 1000 experts Ie: basic expert Expert w trend Direction Expert w Pivots Expert w SAR Expert w ATS win Loss Trend Do this for the highlights and symbols once attached all you have to do is check off the features that you want to see, you will then be able to see the different aspects of using stops and trend Direction

I would like to see the formulas sorted into those that require add ins and those that do not. It is so frustrating to go to a post to find that it requires something that most MetaStock users do not have and probably will not have. If it requires an add in it should be in a category by itself. Not to take anything away from Henry's postings though. I like your postings, just cannot use them. Charley

Thank you Henry, do not get me wrong, I do enjoy your posts and I do realize some can be used with other external formulas such as the Forum DLL. My problem is they are co-mingled with regular formulas. I just think it would be good to separate them. Keep up your good work. Charley

Hey Charley, I agree we should organize the formulae a little better :D I will take care of it as soon as I find the best way to do it ;) Patrick :mrgreen:

As a contriution to the discussion, I would list only systems without Stops and provide the geeral structure of experts with stops under a separate heading leavng to the reader to construct his/her experts/systems for testing. For example, one could have the expert structure for Kase Dev Stop written in this format: Kase Dev Stop: {Kase Dev Stop formulae} Mult:=n; {0-3} AVTR:=Mov(HHV(H,2) - LLV(L,2),20, S); SD:=Stdev(HHV(H,2) - LLV(L,2),20); LE:= {Buy Condition} ; SE:= {Sell Condition} ; SX:= {Buy Condition} OR (LLV(L+AVTR+Mult*SD,20)<C); LX:= {Sell Condition} OR (HHV(H-AVTR-Mult*SD,20)>C); And the same for SAR Stop, Pivot Price Stop, ATR Trailing Stop, Safezone Stop, Advanced Stop, etc. Similar structures could be provided for Profit Stop if appropriate. This would considerably reduce the number of systems presented in full in the Forum (see the number of variations of the Bull Power Bear Power 1 System where separate explorations have been presented also for various values of the ATR and Standard Deviation multipliers) without taking away any information. In a similar fashion, a section devoted to Trend confirmation could be added. The TD confirmation would be written as follows: TD:= ExtFml("PowerPivots.TrendDirection",1,2) LE:= {Buy Condition} AND TD=1; SE:= {Sell Condition} AND TD=-1; SX:= {Exit Short Condition}; LX:= {Exit Long Condition}; Alternative MultiTimeFrame Trend confirmation formulae and/or Sector/Market confirmation formulae and structures could be constructed without cluttering the main Formulae Directory. Regards.