logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
trendsca  
#1 Posted : Friday, April 6, 2012 11:14:10 PM(UTC)
trendsca

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 4/7/2012(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: California

I am trying to program a trend reversal system in MetaStock. I have certain criteria for the market to generate a buy signal (say, a 50 period high), then another set of criteria for the market to generate a sell signal (say, a 20 period low)- I have successfully programed these into MetaStock experts. The issue is, often, when the market is trending higher, after a buy signal, the system will generate another buy signal, and again and again because the subseqent bars also meet my "buy" signal criteria (in this case, 50-day high) and after a sell signal, it will generate a sell signal again, again, and again, if the market keeps trending lower. My question: which function in MS I should use so that once a buy singal is generated, the next signal can only be sell, and once the sell signal is generated, the next system generated signal can only be buy? In other words, I want the system to generate a buy signal when the conditions for a buy signal are first met and then this buy signal will suppress the subsequent buy signals after it, until a sell signal is triggered, and then a fresh buy signal could be generated. Same with sell signals, once a sell signal is generated, the system won't generate additional repetitive sell signals until after a buy signal has been generated. I have gone through the manual and can't see another of the standard functions would enable me to do this. Thanks for pointing out the right direction!
colion  
#2 Posted : Saturday, April 7, 2012 5:24:03 AM(UTC)
colion

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/13/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1

Search the forum for "redundant" and you will find discussions about how to handle this.
trendsca  
#3 Posted : Saturday, April 7, 2012 4:15:11 PM(UTC)
trendsca

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 4/7/2012(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: California

Thank you so much, I have solved the issue by the method explained on this page, just as you have pointed out by searching the word "redundanct": http://forum.equis.com/forums/thread/883.aspx
Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.