logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
thnkbigr  
#1 Posted : Thursday, July 20, 2006 7:55:53 PM(UTC)
thnkbigr

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 7/20/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1

Would you guys know of any technical analysis courses or seminars? I am looking for really advanced courses that would teach you everything you need to know about all of these technical indicators and how they are calculated. thanks a lot Rob
*PP  
#2 Posted : Thursday, July 20, 2006 9:03:14 PM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

dear Rob, Before starting to throw your money on the window try this: 10 (point A) | | | 6 (point B) | | 3 (point C) now, if u can calculate the percentage at wich point B is bellow point A assuming that point C was the start point then u`ve managed to calculate (almost entierly) a very popular oscillator wich has an intimidating name making sound like it is roket sience... :D ...the oscillator starts with s....and ends with.... c. 85% of indicators are easier than this and about 10% a little more complicated. Please do not throw your money (give it to me if u don`t need it :twisted: )
Jose  
#3 Posted : Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:36:59 PM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Lesson 1: Understanding the SC oscillator construction. [code:1:2bce7b1529]{ SillycastiC oscillator Plots midPoint as a % of hiPoint/loPoint range http://www.metastocktools.com } { User inputs } pointA:=Input("(high)Point A",-100,100,10); pointB:=Input("(mid)Point B",-100,100,6); pointC:=Input("(low)Point C",-100,100,3); plot:=Input("plot: [1]SC % Value, [2]make it Interesting",1,2,1); { Sort Hi/Lo points } hiPoint:=Max(pointA,pointC); loPoint:=Min(pointA,pointC); { Restrict mid-point to within A-C range } midPoint:=If(pointB>hiPoint,hiPoint,pointB); midPoint:=If(midPoint<loPoint,loPoint,midPoint); { Sc Osc } Range:=Max(hiPoint-loPoint,.00001); ScOsc:=(midPoint-loPoint)/range*100; { Interesting Sc Osc version } ScOscInt:=ScOsc*Sin(Cum(1)); { Plot oscillator in own window } If(plot=1,ScOsc,ScOscInt) [/code:1:2bce7b1529] jose '-)
*PP  
#4 Posted : Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:14:45 PM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

it can be done like jose (thx :| ) or like this : (10-6)/(10-3)*100 = 57.142857(142857) ="sillicastic" but next 100-57.142857 = stochastic and more much more than this (i did it my way) (6-3)/(10-3)*100 = stochastic (man that was complicated)
wabbit  
#5 Posted : Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:46:20 PM(UTC)
wabbit

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers, Unverified Users
Joined: 10/28/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,111
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 16 post(s)
... and here's me looking like a fool when I pronounce it "so car sick" or "sarcastic" ;) wabbit :D
Jose  
#6 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 12:18:55 AM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
*PP wrote:
it can be done like jose (thx :| ) or like this : (10-6)/(10-3)*100 = 57.142857(142857) ="sillicastic" but next 100-57.142857 = stochastic and more much more than this (i did it my way) (6-3)/(10-3)*100 = stochastic (man that was complicated)
PP, your SillycastiC plot/value is upside down. That would make it an OopseySillycastiC. And without the "MakeItInteresting" option, it would be an OopseySillycastiCflatLiner prone to ennuihexadosis. jose '-
Jose  
#7 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 12:33:03 AM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Before you ask if I'm making up new words... ennui - a feeling of weariness and dissatisfaction. hexa - a numerical prefix is a prefix that denotes a number, such as hexadecimal (16). dosis - designates the quantity of a material. ennuihexadosis (sometimes ennuibinarydosis) - a feeling of weariness and dissatisfaction with large doses of things numerical in nature. jose '-)
smg  
#8 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 1:41:51 AM(UTC)
smg

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 8/13/2005(UTC)
Posts: 90

142857 - It is a wonderful number. Wondering if it has some particular use for Market analysis. 142857 * 1 = 285714 142857 * 2 = 428571 142857 * 3 = 571428 142857 * 4 = 285714 142857 * 5 = 714285 142857 * 6 = 857142 142857 * 7 = 999999 You might have noticed that the number keeps revolving itself as we multiply it by 1-6. Incidentally we get these revolving numbers by dividing 1 by prime numbers (1/7) = 0.142857 Do these numbers give some significant insight into Markets like fib. numbers. Let's hope we find it sometime. Regards SMG
wabbit  
#9 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 2:56:01 AM(UTC)
wabbit

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers, Unverified Users
Joined: 10/28/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,111
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 16 post(s)
smg, Check your numbers! Like a red rag to a bull are numbers to a maths student! 142857 * 1 = 142857 142857 * 2 = 285714 142857 * 3 = 428571 142857 * 4 = 571428 142857 * 5 = 714285 142857 * 6 = 857142 142857 * 7 = 999999 142857 * 8 = 1142856 (take the leading 1 and add it to the last digit 6 to make 7 - read 142857) 142857 * 9 = 1285713 (take the leading 1 and add it to the last digit 3 to make 4 - read 285714) 142857 * 10 = 1428570 (take the leading 1 and add it to the last digit 0 to make 1 - read 428571) 142857 * 11 = 1571427 (take the leading 1 and add it to the last digit 7 to make 8 - read 571428) 142857 * 12 = 1714284 142857 * 13 = 1857141 142857 * 14 = 1999998 (doesnt follow here, but leading 1 and trailing 8 make 999999) 142857 * 15 = 2142855 142857 * 16 = 2285712 142857 * 17 = 2428569 142857 * 18 = 2571426 142857 * 19 = 2714283 142857 * 20 = 2857140 142857 * 21 = 2999997 (doesnt follow here, but leading 2 and trailing 7 make 999999) etc system has "breaks" when the multiplier is itself a multiple of 7. Prime numbers:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html wrote:
A prime number (or prime integer, often simply called a "prime" for short) is a positive integer p>1 that has no positive integer divisors other than 1 and p itself. (More concisely, a prime number p is a positive integer having exactly one positive divisor other than 1.)
So the first prime numbers are: 1 (is NOT prime - p>1) 2 3 5 7 11 13 etc How does dividing 1 by the primes fit into the scheme? 1/2 = 0.5 1/3 = 0.3333333... 1/5 = 0.2 1/7 = 0.142857 (approx) (this one might have some validation?) 1/11 - 0.090909090909090... wabbit :D
*PP  
#10 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 7:42:48 AM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

Thanks Jose youre a god :lol: . Rob the point remains ...do not throw your money.
PTJim  
#11 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 8:16:29 PM(UTC)
PTJim

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 5/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 252

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Rob, the above posts are worth reading for their hilarity and I agree with the main point - there's many ways to waste money on "experts". How far along the TA learning curve are you? (FWIW, I'm still an embryo myself). Not knowing the answer to this question, here's just a couple of ideas: "Technical Analysis for Dummies" by Barbara Rockefeller - inexpensive and pretty good. One of the bibles is "Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets" by John Murphy - his "The Visual Investor" is also very good. If you want to understand Bollinger Bands and associated indicators (I find these very intriguing; MetaStock has some Bollinger functions and there are two Bollinger plugins for MS), go to the source: "Bollinger on Bollinger Bands" by John Bollinger and his homepage http://www.bollingerbands.com/ellent resource with many sharp people participating worldwide. I think you have to invest in software tools (like MetaStock) and educational materials, but you don't have to waste money. One other thing: it's brutally difficult for a geek like me to come to terms with, but I'm becoming a believer in trying to understand something about the psychology of markets and the psychology you'll need within yourself if you want to be a successful trader - I haven't worked through it all, but you might consider "Trading in the Zone" by Mark Douglas and "Trading for a Living" by Alexander Elder, among others. Yes, my book pile grows on a regular basis. As an addendum to Hayseed's post (just below), you can go to https://www.metastock.com/customer/resources/TAAZ/
hayseed  
#12 Posted : Friday, July 21, 2006 9:46:53 PM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

well done , ptjim.... h hey rob..... like jim, i'm not really sure how far down the path you are..... don't overlook the internet as a learning source in itself...... years worth of reading material, most for free.... you mentioned how they are calculated, ..... studying the codes should shed some light there..... a couple sites offer indicator macros for excel, they might print the math formulas in a more textbook form..... several sites under education have helped me over the years..... h
Ben_Zurich  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:24:59 PM(UTC)
Ben_Zurich

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 7/4/2006(UTC)
Posts: 57
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Take the CMT exam (over 3 Levels) self-study, some lessons online. gives you an excellent overview and when you prepare for it, you will be reading in a systematic manner. www.mta.org It' s like the CFA, but a lot less material, and a good systematic approach to it. It won't teach you the holy grail, but it's well worth it. Of course you could also just download their curriculums and read the required books without doing an exam.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.