logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
JonRoberts  
#1 Posted : Monday, January 16, 2006 3:43:41 PM(UTC)
JonRoberts

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/22/2005(UTC)
Posts: 31

I have developed a custom exploration but am seeking some help or guidance on a problem. When I run the exploration and get the list of securities that match the filter criteria, one can "Inspect" the column data for a given security and see what the values were for the various columns for both today's date and all previous days. However, for the rejected securities, one does not have this option, at least as best I can tell. Is it possible to obtain the column data for the rejected securities? It seems to me one should be able to do so, as looking at the actual data behind a specific rejection would help to determine if the filter and/or column formulas are doing what you are wanting them to do. Thanks much! Jon Roberts
hayseed  
#2 Posted : Monday, January 16, 2006 5:18:52 PM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

hey jon.... one way might be to include a column with the indicator itself in it.... then add that column in the 'or' fashion in the filter..... leaving out column c below will on return a couple securities scaning the nas 100, however including it will return results for all.... the 'a' and 'b' columns still do there job, just now all rejects are listed also....h Exploration notes Col A: Cross(RSI(14),70) Col B: Cross(30,RSI(14)) [color=blue:2706feb02c]Col C: RSI(14)[/color] Filter colA OR colB [color=darkblue:2706feb02c]OR colC[/color] Filter enabled Yes Periodicity Daily Records required 4000
JonRoberts  
#3 Posted : Monday, January 16, 2006 8:38:11 PM(UTC)
JonRoberts

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/22/2005(UTC)
Posts: 31

thanks hayseed. that seems like a good work around! I'll give it a shot! Jon
Justin  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:20:18 PM(UTC)
Justin

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Unverified Users
Joined: 9/13/2004(UTC)
Posts: 673
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

I have found there is no real reason to use the Filter at all for situations where you'd want to inspect the results. If you put a conditional statement into column A, it will report a 1.000 if true, and a 0.000 if not true. You can simply sort the results of the Explorer by the column to get all the "Trues" at the top and the "Not Trues" at the bottom. This way, you can still inspect everything while still screening the results.
hayseed  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:03:26 PM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

picky picky picky .... actually there are some reasons to include filters in explorations with conditional statements.... depending on one's definition of "a conditional statement " , conditional statements are not limited to just 1's and 0's.... its true my suggestion was somewhat sloppy...... without knowing jon's exploration or more importantly the explorations purpose, it was just a quick adaptation of my rsi exploration....... picky picky picky......:wink:.... h
Justin  
#6 Posted : Friday, January 27, 2006 9:26:43 PM(UTC)
Justin

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Unverified Users
Joined: 9/13/2004(UTC)
Posts: 673
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

Actually I thought your reply was great, just wanted to give an alternate option :D
Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.