bh2007 wrote:1. There is no dispute that borrowing interest must be incurred in SHORTING stocks for international market (perhaps no the case for some US stock).
No one is disputing the fact that when you want to use a computer to simulate trading, the computer should be programmed to take into account all factors and faithfully reproduce the trades just as a human trader would, including costs, interest earnings, taxes etc. No trading application I have seen/used takes EVERY factor into account for EVERY trader around the world for EVERY market; sometimes, you just have to accept that most trading applications simulations model MOST aspects or trading, and if you need more accurate models then these must be individually programmed. This applies for MS.
bh2007 wrote:2. Serious trader must consider all COST(s) from both LONG / SHORT trading.
Agree. Not all the costs from LONG trades are included in the MS EST either, so either have to be programmed separately, or discounted in the results.
bh2007 wrote:3. Mr. Wabbbit mentioned that no Metastock clients ever raised this kind of query in the past 27 years DOES NOT equal to “cost on borrowing interest in SHORT trading is not exist”
Have a read through the wishlists for changes to MS, and see for yourself that no one has asked for it previously. Does it mean that SHORT trade borrowing costs are not important? No, it just means that no one has considered it necessary enough to request Equis make changes to their software, or, the trader has found other means to model/discount those costs.
bh2007 wrote:6. Possible explanation – C for item (3) – there is already some solution for resolving this fundamental problem in Metastock.
You have access to the Metastock formula language and the MDK to be able to customise the simulation as you need (within limits).
You could also export the equity curve to another application and make changes there; or you can extract the trades from the ST_DATA.mdb and work with the information there, or you could find out whether existing products like TradeSim will do the additional work you require. (From experience, TradeSim is a far more capable trading simulator than MS EST and yet it still does not accurately reflect the trading of EVERY trader or market, it requires considerable customisation.)
I've previously mentioned customising existing codes such as Roy Larsen's TE suite, or the VST suite to better suit your requirements.
bh2007 wrote:To be fair, all business people would very concern all potential and major COSTs in his business plan. He would spend most of his effect on detailing all COST in his plan at very beginning stage; this is the objective of the Metastock’s trading simulation all about!
The MS EST takes some costs into account, but you cannot expect a single application to take into account the trading styles, techniques, costs etc for every trader in every market with every broker; it's a model not real life. I cannot remember who said it, but it's very relevant here, "A model is a simplification of reality intended to promote understanding."
bh2007 wrote:I am not coming to this forum asking for dispute with people. I am coming here for consulting senior metastock user and designer (if any)…..
You've made your point and you've been given an answer -- add the request to wishlist and see what happens, in the mean time, program the costs yourself, or identify additional products to supplement your trade modelling.
bh2007 wrote:I cannot understood the reason behind - people keep telling me borrowing COST is not important in Metastock stimulation and can be ignored by most Metastock users for 27 years!
No one has said that cost of borrowing is not important. Just because it's not included in the software doesn't mean that it's not important.
I'm a MS user, but I don't short stocks and if I did short stocks in Australia (note: I'm not in the US) my broker has a completely different fee structure than yours, so how do you want Equis to deal with the two different cost models?. I model FX trading in MS and have no access to customise the swap cost without resorting to my own programming (you have to write your own swap consideration in MT4/5 trade simulation as well, so it's not just MS) so you just have to get on with making the model as accurate as you can given given the limitations of the applications and their programming; it sucks, but it's life.
bh2007 wrote:Trader accepts such simulated result for his shorting plan in stock (without full consideration on transaction costs) is a NEGLIGENCE and not to mention about professionalism! – Please accept my apology on serious wordings.
Just because it's not in the model, no one is suggesting you ignore the cost of trading. I dare say changes to the EST are going to be a loooong way off, so you're going to have to do something about this yourself in the meantime.
bh2007 wrote:I accept the reality that Metastock has no such feature to fulfill my shorting plan at present - already purchased the version 11 EOD software, what can I do? But all products could be improved, can’t they?
If you don't add to the product wishlist, the application wont be changed (if the functionality in the wishlist is ever recognised?) What is considered by the Equis developers as the most useful functionality to the most of number of users would be given higher priority to be included in future releases than functions only requested once by an individual.
bh2007 wrote:However, I never see the logic behind – no user ever raised his concern about SHORTING cost? Perhaps he ues calculator and paper to assess his shorting cost? Is there any other more efficient method than a simulator?
Yes, write your own code to supplement MS, or go the whole way and write your own application which is ultimately customisable to reflect your individual trading circumstances.
bh2007 wrote:Wish some patching soon in Version 11 EOD or POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE in layman level
MS12 has been released without (m)any changes to the EST, so I wouldn't be holding your breath for an update to any previous legacy versions any time soon.
wabbit [:D]