logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
streamyx  
#1 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:44:29 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

hi
i am new here
just started to learn about meta stock formulas recently

would appreciate if someone can tell me what is the right formula to identify the parabolic SAR cross over from top to bottom (ie triggers positive signal)

i tried this formula : Cross(C,SAR(0.02,0.2))
but it does not work

thanks

streamyx
*PP  
#2 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 6:55:59 AM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

streamyx your cross(c,sar(0.02,0.2)) works perfectly;
streamyx  
#3 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:24:02 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

hi pp

I used this formula to scan but the results came out zero, did not capture any stocks at all. I am sure that particular day when i used this formula there were many stocks where the parabolic SAR moved from top to bottom for the first time.

i just want a formula that can capture the change in parabolic SAR from negative to positive.

would appreciate your help.

thanks again

streamyx

*PP  
#4 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:34:57 AM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

streamyx,

the formula is working perfectly as i have said before. i think the problem is in exploration options because u have checked there load minimum records button. Load 32767 records (or less ;) ) and it should be ok

cheers

streamyx  
#5 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:54:24 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

Dear pp

thanks a million for your help!! it finally works hurray!!

i have asked so many people but they could not help me to solve the problem......

thanks again ;)

cheers

streamyx  
#6 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:59:04 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

dear pp

if you dont mind, can you tell me what is this data load thing for? and why do i need to set it to 32767 from the default 1300?

streamyx

*PP  
#7 Posted : Thursday, March 22, 2007 10:04:57 AM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

streamyx,

i can tell u what that load "thing" is for but i strongly suggest u to read the metastock help because u really nneed it. In that way u will not be anymore at the mercy of others; for a fast answer to ur question open metastock help check The Explorer section it will explain better than me

Jose  
#8 Posted : Friday, March 23, 2007 10:03:09 AM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
*PP wrote:
Load 32767 records (or less ;) )
32767 records... sheeezzz - that's only about 130 years' worth of EOD data, PP. How are we to search for any signals generated during the 1600's Tulip mania era, eh? jose '-)
*PP  
#9 Posted : Friday, March 23, 2007 10:44:04 AM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

well...:)) just to be sure :))
streamyx  
#10 Posted : Sunday, April 15, 2007 10:26:42 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

dear pp

just to tell you that you suggestion works perfectly well

thanks ;)

*PP  
#11 Posted : Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:02:08 PM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

go on then, u have a long road ahead and if u allow me here is another one: after finishing with metastock in such way that u can turn any ideea in to an indicator/system/exploration/expert please don`t expect to just write a code and earn money. everybody (well...almost...) knows how to code but the hardest part is to make a real strategy wich gives you enough confidence to trade and not to gamble, that is possible in my opinion only by reinventing the wheel or another way stated using proprietary technical analysis methods.

Btw, i am not a millionaire or somekind of guru so maby i am wrong but what i have said is based on my own experiences watching (US markets) and trading (local market) for... well a nice number (2007-2000 ;) ?) of years now.

good luck

amory  
#12 Posted : Thursday, April 26, 2007 4:29:16 PM(UTC)
amory

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 4/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 99
Location: sydney australia

Streamyx, this formula of yours is really short & simple, but very effective. nearly all the stocks which come up, have some merit for trading. if I might suggest an additional line, just to separate the wheat from the chaff:

AND VOLUME>200000 AND V*WC()>=60000

that means good volume and at least $60K worth traded on the day. you can of course change these figures if you think they are too high or too low.

anther interesting thing I noticed: the stocks showing a change in their SAR seem to fall into two distinct categories: those which are recovering from a slump & those which have had a slight dip from the top & are about to recover from that. after trying out a few, I have used a moving average (the 100,E of the closing price) as a dividing line, which enabled me to divide it into two explorations, one for above & one for below that MA. all you do is, add the line

AND C>Mov(C,100,E)

to one exploration, and the line

AND C<Mov(C,100,E)

to the other, and you've got the two lots (the slump ones & the dip-from-top ones) neatly separated into two explorations. don't forget to give them two different names!

thanks for the formula.

streamyx  
#13 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2007 10:12:48 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

Dear Amory

thanks for sharing, you have given me a new idea to improve the way i use parabolic

cheers

streamyx

streamyx  
#14 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2007 10:15:05 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

dear pp

how about if i want to scan for parabolic crossover on a weekly basis instead of daily closing basis, any idea how i modify the formula?

thanks

streamyx

*PP  
#15 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2007 10:27:30 AM(UTC)
*PP

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 4/1/2006(UTC)
Posts: 135
Location: Romania

U should modify the exploration not the formula. When u edit (create) a exploration there is a options button and from there u should set the exploration periodicity to weekly.

take care ;)

streamyx  
#16 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2007 11:29:35 AM(UTC)
streamyx

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 3/22/2007(UTC)
Posts: 10

thanks so much pp

Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Similar Topics
parabolic SAR cross over formula in the enhanced system tester (Formula Assistance)
by SulemanShah 2/27/2009 3:51:31 AM(UTC)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.