logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
coops  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2007 5:50:09 PM(UTC)
coops

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 12/2/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2

When I set up an exploration using the value of the RMO oscillator in a column, the Values shown in the Exploration Results are not the same as shown on the charts. Why is this and is it not possible to use this feature in the explorer?
hayseed  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2007 6:28:56 PM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

hey coop..... expand your period tested to at least 1000...... rahuls deal is based largely on moving averages..... moving averages will turn small disrepancies in to larger ones if the period tested is not similar in length to chart viewed..... h
coops  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2007 6:42:55 PM(UTC)
coops

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 12/2/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2

Hi Heyseed,

Thanks so much for the astonishingly quick reply.

It's amazing how such a simple thing can solve a problem!

Thanks once again.

Regards, coops

NetWorthless  
#4 Posted : Thursday, January 4, 2007 10:48:30 PM(UTC)
NetWorthless

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 12/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 38

hayseed wrote:
...... rahuls deal is based largely on moving averages.....


Hey seed (pun intended)-

Did I miss something? On what do you base this claim?
hayseed  
#5 Posted : Friday, January 5, 2007 9:01:49 AM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

hey net.... if you change the indicators to line form instead of histogram the moving average form is visable..... likely a touch of rsi or momentum is involved, but the structure seems moving averageish.... close approximation to them can be obtained.....

eariler i had spent some time playing around with v 10 , v 9 , rahuls deal and esignal in an effort to ,,,,,, well lets just say ,,,, expand my options..... and of course you'll understand thats probably as far as we should go on that subject......

just change from histogram to line form and you see.....h

NetWorthless  
#6 Posted : Friday, January 5, 2007 9:23:24 AM(UTC)
NetWorthless

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 12/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 38

hayseed wrote:

.... if you change the indicators to line form instead of histogram the moving average form is visable..... likely a touch of rsi or momentum is involved, but the structure seems moving averageish.... close approximation to them can be obtained.....



Say it isn't so! I'll check it out. I hope you haven’t let the proverbial cat out of the bag. [;)]

PTJim  
#7 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2007 1:45:43 PM(UTC)
PTJim

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 5/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 252

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 6 post(s)
hayseed wrote:
hey net.... if you change the indicators to line form instead of histogram the moving average form is visable..... likely a touch of rsi or momentum is involved, but the structure seems moving averageish.... close approximation to them can be obtained.....

Anybody else smell that?

Over here, the RMOdor just got a bit stronger.

hayseed  
#8 Posted : Sunday, January 7, 2007 4:13:40 PM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

hey jim.... moving average systems are often one of the best deals going...... rahuls deal seems directed at helping us stay focused on long oportunitys when the averages are strong and short oportunitys when they are weak..... a filter to increase our odds....

properly applied it should help the average trader and esp should help the average highly leveraged trader, ie options or forex..... h

NetWorthless  
#9 Posted : Sunday, January 7, 2007 5:09:27 PM(UTC)
NetWorthless

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 12/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 38

C'mon Jim, you know that you want this upgrade. Go for it! Grab the brass ring. Listen to your better half. [6]
PTJim  
#10 Posted : Monday, January 8, 2007 12:58:07 PM(UTC)
PTJim

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 5/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 252

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 6 post(s)
Nothing against moving averages, 'Seed, I use 'em myself, but let's say (hypothetically) that somebody took standard moving average techniques, slapped copy-protection and a fancy name on them and packaged the thing as The Next Big Thing Taking The Investment World By Storm! - would that be cause for excitement and adulation?

I see moving averages, combined with blinking red/green squares, advertised on late-night TV for extortionate prices all the time. It must be a profitable con to run, because I see these things over and over.

We now return you to my previously-scheduled grumpiness . . . . . . .

Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.