logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
turtle  
#21 Posted : Wednesday, October 5, 2005 8:18:32 AM(UTC)
turtle

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 9/28/2005(UTC)
Posts: 36
Location: Malaysia

A Cup of Tea Nan-in, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1868-1912), received a university professor who came to inquire about Zen. Nan-in served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring. The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!" "Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?" This is from Zen school. Hope it helps. :oops:
Jose  
#22 Posted : Wednesday, October 5, 2005 10:04:24 AM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
turtle wrote:
A Cup of Tea Nan-in, a Japanese master...
Let me guess... You view yourself as the Zen master, and we would have to be the fools with heads too full of opinions to take in you advice (or market speculation in this case). Here is one for you, Turtle:
Zen Flesh, Zen Bones: A Collection of Zen and Pre-Zen Writings"), must have decency to also quote source.[/quote wrote:
jose '-)
turtle  
#23 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 12:42:20 AM(UTC)
turtle

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 9/28/2005(UTC)
Posts: 36
Location: Malaysia

A Cup of Tea © Nan-in ©, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1868-1912), received a university professor who came to inquire about Zen © Nan-in © served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring. The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!" "Like this cup," Nan-in © said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen © unless you first empty your cup?" All right reserved by Nan-in © (1868-1912) It is 2005 now I supposed the copyright owned by Nan-in © has expired? How to approach the teachings, the so-called four reliances: - Rely on the message, not on the personality of the teacher. - Rely on the meaning, not just the words. - Rely on the real meaning, not just the provisional meaning. - Rely on your wisdom and insight, not just on your ordinary, judgmental mind. Nan-in ©:wink:
Jose  
#24 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 3:22:49 AM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
turtle wrote:
All right reserved by Nan-in © (1868-1912) It is 2005 now I supposed the copyright owned by Nan-in © has expired?
Mr Turtle, your sarcasm fails to address the fact that you've copied & posted copyright material, word for word, without crediting the source: Page 19, "Zen Flesh, Zen Bones: A Collection of Zen and Pre-Zen Writings"
turtle wrote:
- Rely on the message, not on the personality of the teacher.
You're missing the point, Mr Turtle: You're no more a teacher of wisdom than any other anonymous plagiarist. jose '-)
Patrick  
#25 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 4:00:15 AM(UTC)
Patrick

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 9/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,266

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Turtle and Jose ... Please do not continue with this ... Let's get back to the topic ... Patrick :mrgreen:
turtle  
#26 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 4:27:55 AM(UTC)
turtle

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 9/28/2005(UTC)
Posts: 36
Location: Malaysia

Anytime you point the finger of blame someone, remember that there are 4 fingers pointing back at you. :P
Jose  
#27 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 6:02:25 AM(UTC)
Jose

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 1/19/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,065
Location: Koh Pha-Ngan, Earth

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Patrick wrote:
Let's get back to the topic ...
This thread's topic, before it got derailed by Zen Turtle & his irrelevant esoteric discourse:
Quote:
...and would love to hear if your trading results are close to the theorized results.
As mentioned before, my own actual trading results have been better than backtest-derived expectations. This may have been due to luck (the system caught some good trending periods), or due to overcautious expectations in backtesting (applied 1.5% total slippage per trade). All documented Pegasus' trading results (including some very major losses), here: http://www.metastocktools.com/Pegasus/Pegasys.htm jose '-)
turtle  
#28 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 6:26:09 AM(UTC)
turtle

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 9/28/2005(UTC)
Posts: 36
Location: Malaysia

The more someone is creative, the more chance they have of sabotaging their performance. Successful trading requires a kind of intelligence that can realize and enforce its own limitations. Successful system traders apply every ounce of intelligence they have into the creation of their systems, but they're dumbbells about following them. You've got to have schizoid approach. Work like hell to make it good, and then ignore it. President Bush would be a great trader of he had a system. By Richard Dennis ©
Stock market is a place where hard work do not pay. Mr. CK, I hope this can help improve your trading career? :idea: Hope you still have the Windows © (Bill Gates & Mircrosoft Corp. All rights reserved 2005) of Opportunity to imporve and fine tuning your trading system. Those system that works that makes money is not that hard to follow and stick with. If a system that is hard to stick with or follow by all mean it is not a workable system but simply an adult toy. :D by ZEN Ninja Turtle © All Rigths Reserved.
hayseed  
#29 Posted : Thursday, October 6, 2005 11:39:54 AM(UTC)
hayseed

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 3/7/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,346

yeah.... well first my answer to ck's very good orignal questzen.... no..... the questzen conditzens forced that reply..... now for unsolicted thoughts.... most, if not all, of the metastock supplied trading systems have beat the s&p over the past 5 years.... while at first glance that might sound like something to crow about, deeper thought might reveal a risk in backtesting over long periods of time.... my active trading is in the dia, spy and oex pits, the gains/losses/volatility there are painfully obvious..... the dia and spy pits are professional traders..... the oex is comprised by the worlds most compulsive addicted gamblers, hence the origin of vix........ see ya in the red room.....h
Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.