logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
cassianoqs  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:04:50 AM(UTC)
cassianoqs

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 7/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 5

ROC(OBV(),20,%) This formula works in an Indicator but in The Explorer returns stranges values. Why?
wabbit  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:58:38 PM(UTC)
wabbit

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers, Unverified Users
Joined: 10/28/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,111
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 16 post(s)
... sort of the same question as, "Why couldn't Eric ride a bike" Because he was a fish. What do you mean by strange results? Can you quantify strange? Do you you have a screen capture showing the strange-ity? Have you looked in the help section for a possible answer? We need more info if you want an answer.... wabbit :D
Patrick  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 2:33:58 PM(UTC)
Patrick

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 9/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,266

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hi cassianoqs, Wabbit is right, we need more info but my guess would be your exploration load options. Make sure you do not have "load minimum records" selected ... Patrick :mrgreen:
cassianoqs  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:10:51 PM(UTC)
cassianoqs

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 7/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 5

an example (Load 500 Records is selected.): indicator: 8.02246 explorer: 277.6089 I changed to load 5000 Records and now: indicator: 8.02246 explorer: 8.0225 How many records should be loaded to run this formula in The Explorer? ROC(OBV(),20,%)
Patrick  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:44:17 PM(UTC)
Patrick

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 9/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,266

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I know it does not make sense but please try the same tests with : ROC(OBV(),20,$) Are the results correct then? Patrick :mrgreen: PS: What version of Metastock ?
cassianoqs  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 7:33:38 PM(UTC)
cassianoqs

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 7/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 5

Hi Patrick, I use Metastock version 9.0 ROC(OBV(),20,$) Results the same : 5772600.0000 (500 or 5000 records loaded) What about % ? ROC(OBV(),20,%) shouldn't be equal ROC(OBV(),20,$) * 100 / OBV() ? ROC(OBV(),20,%) = 8.02246 ROC(OBV(),20,$) * 100 / OBV() = 7.4267
Patrick  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, July 20, 2005 7:56:37 PM(UTC)
Patrick

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers
Joined: 9/8/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,266

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I'm guesing the % function is messed up ... I would make sure that ROC(OBV,1,$) give the right value and then once this is confirmed use your formula : ROC(OBV(),20,$) * 100 / OBV() You could also compare it to this : ((OBV()-Ref(OBV(),-20))*100)/OBV() I will test it in 9.1 ... Patrick :mrgreen:
Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.