logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
andreasrothe  
#1 Posted : Sunday, June 26, 2005 12:22:53 PM(UTC)
andreasrothe

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/25/2005(UTC)
Posts: 27

Anybody ever tried coupling Metastock and Hyperorder (an automated order placement system? If so, could you please share how this is done, ie where does one enter the commands in Metastock, etc.
kanellop  
#2 Posted : Sunday, June 26, 2005 1:34:09 PM(UTC)
kanellop

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/3/2005(UTC)
Posts: 181

I have not tried this System, but i am interesting to learn more about it! I believe also that Many Others People in this Forum will have the same opinion as me! Can you tell us more for it and tell us their Site to see it more closer? George K.
wabbit  
#3 Posted : Monday, June 27, 2005 9:15:29 AM(UTC)
wabbit

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers, Unverified Users
Joined: 10/28/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,111
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 16 post(s)
All, please don’t take this post the wrong way - I only intend to assist, not to offend: I would be EXTREMELY careful about completely automating a trading system, even if the software systems are capable of doing so. I have yet to see any successful semi-automatic trading system, let alone a fully automatic one. People have been working for years and years to make 'nearly right' systems and trade those systems only because they have the final choice about the trade itself. Even then, the majority of people who trade will end up losing money and return to other income stream solutions. I cannot remember the numbers exactly nor the source, but not so long ago in a lifestyle magazine it was reported that only 10% of day traders in America make enough money to sustain themselves purely on trading; 30% went bankrupt within (a small number of) months from starting trading. The remainder, obviously, made only a little money to supplement income or lost sufficiently least to avoid bankruptcy. In any case the numbers weren’t that good! I would also read between the lines here and say the majority of these people were directly involved in their investment decisions, and that if they hadn't been then the numbers failing would have been dramatically higher. Removing the human from the loop may remove the emotion and the hesitation, but often it is this hesitation that will prevent you from making a stupid decision. Machines cannot make decisions on their own and will do EXACTLY what you tell them to do. The computer doesn't understand terms like, "why" and "I didn't mean that". Machines cannot take the blame. If you go broke, the creditors will not care that a computer was making bad investment choices on your behalf, especially so, if you tell them you wrote the program yourself! You will still have to fork over the deed to your house. Many, many people have been working for a lot longer than I have been alive, using some of the most sophisticated computers and algorithms in the world to try to predict the stock market, and failed. Think of an easier problem to solve... like predicting the weather. The weather tomorrow will be relatively similar to today with some or no change! Even with the most massive computer systems and the most awesomely powerful algorithms, they only get the forecast right a small fraction of the time! (I have been programming computers for 23 years and still have trouble getting the computer to understand the "jist" of the problem, let alone tell me the answers!) Additionally, there are times when connectivity to the internet and/or the exchange is not always possible, the bandwidth may not be there or the server or router may be busy and your trades are hanging, buy or sell (both situations are bad) Is there a back up system to the automation? Do you get warning of impending doom before it all goes legs up? If you do get a warning, how much warning? What could you do about it? etc etc I just think there is too much to go wrong with what (I think) you want to achieve, that only a human (you) could identify and rectify, before you lose your house, partner and pets! To my way of thinking (a lot longer term than most - I invest not trade) if a stock is a good buy, then it should still be a good buy tomorrow (investment terms) or at least in 60 minutes (for traders). If you have a system that is soooo time sensitive that you must trade within the nanosecond, I truly believe you will fail to achieve your expectations. I may be playing the Devil's Advocate but if it stops you losing your nest-egg then I have done the right thing! Hope this helps. wabbit :D
andreasrothe  
#4 Posted : Thursday, June 30, 2005 1:35:55 PM(UTC)
andreasrothe

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/25/2005(UTC)
Posts: 27

kanellop wrote:
I have not tried this System, but i am interesting to learn more about it! I believe also that Many Others People in this Forum will have the same opinion as me! Can you tell us more for it and tell us their Site to see it more closer? George K.
I have made some progress on getting the two to function together. You specify HyperorderAPI function calls inside of the condition box in MS Alert. Still have to work out how to prevent the Alert from sending through too many orders. Hyperorder can be found on www.hypertrader.it (where you can also find other very interesting 'free' software, such as realtime datafeed software to feed Metastock with realtime data, on tick level if you want - assuming you have an account with one of their interface partners).
andreasrothe  
#5 Posted : Thursday, June 30, 2005 1:56:17 PM(UTC)
andreasrothe

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/25/2005(UTC)
Posts: 27

wabbit wrote:
All, please don’t take this post the wrong way - I only intend to assist, not to offend: I would be EXTREMELY careful about completely automating a trading system, even if the software systems are capable of doing so. I have yet to see any successful semi-automatic trading system, let alone a fully automatic one. People have been working for years and years to make 'nearly right' systems and trade those systems only because they have the final choice about the trade itself. Even then, the majority of people who trade will end up losing money and return to other income stream solutions. I cannot remember the numbers exactly nor the source, but not so long ago in a lifestyle magazine it was reported that only 10% of day traders in America make enough money to sustain themselves purely on trading; 30% went bankrupt within (a small number of) months from starting trading. The remainder, obviously, made only a little money to supplement income or lost sufficiently least to avoid bankruptcy. In any case the numbers weren’t that good! I would also read between the lines here and say the majority of these people were directly involved in their investment decisions, and that if they hadn't been then the numbers failing would have been dramatically higher. Removing the human from the loop may remove the emotion and the hesitation, but often it is this hesitation that will prevent you from making a stupid decision. Machines cannot make decisions on their own and will do EXACTLY what you tell them to do. The computer doesn't understand terms like, "why" and "I didn't mean that". Machines cannot take the blame. If you go broke, the creditors will not care that a computer was making bad investment choices on your behalf, especially so, if you tell them you wrote the program yourself! You will still have to fork over the deed to your house. Many, many people have been working for a lot longer than I have been alive, using some of the most sophisticated computers and algorithms in the world to try to predict the stock market, and failed. Think of an easier problem to solve... like predicting the weather. The weather tomorrow will be relatively similar to today with some or no change! Even with the most massive computer systems and the most awesomely powerful algorithms, they only get the forecast right a small fraction of the time! (I have been programming computers for 23 years and still have trouble getting the computer to understand the "jist" of the problem, let alone tell me the answers!) Additionally, there are times when connectivity to the internet and/or the exchange is not always possible, the bandwidth may not be there or the server or router may be busy and your trades are hanging, buy or sell (both situations are bad) Is there a back up system to the automation? Do you get warning of impending doom before it all goes legs up? If you do get a warning, how much warning? What could you do about it? etc etc I just think there is too much to go wrong with what (I think) you want to achieve, that only a human (you) could identify and rectify, before you lose your house, partner and pets! To my way of thinking (a lot longer term than most - I invest not trade) if a stock is a good buy, then it should still be a good buy tomorrow (investment terms) or at least in 60 minutes (for traders). If you have a system that is soooo time sensitive that you must trade within the nanosecond, I truly believe you will fail to achieve your expectations. I may be playing the Devil's Advocate but if it stops you losing your nest-egg then I have done the right thing! Hope this helps. wabbit :D
Assistance is always appreciated - but... Sure you have to be careful, but if you aren't, then you shouldn't be in this game anyway :wink: Perhaps only 10% being successful is exactly because the remainder were directly involved, with intuition coming into play. Pure logic is good and sound - and if you cannot program a computer to do what you want it to do, I agree with wabbit, it is NOT the computers fault. BUT if you have a well-tested strategy (using system tester over historical data) that relies exclusively on logic, and this strategy is more profitable than non-profitable (please note, I did not say makes more profitable trades than non-proftable ones), it will always beat intuition, emotion, hesitation, etc hands-down. It all comes down to one thing - are you an investor (like wabbit) or a day-trader. When day-trading, you do NOT have the time to end up in analysis paralysis (fundamentals, intuition, etc) - nor do you have the finger-speed to enter and/or close many trades quickly. It is a totally different game to investing - agreed, wabbit? I am really not knocking you, wabbit, but the underlying requirements and philosophies are fundamentally different. If you apply investing-thinking to day-trading, I fully agree with you, you are practically dead before you even start. But I am sick and tired of investors and fund managers (not saying you are amongst them, wabbit) making minimal returns on my money - I would rather day-trade, and be in control of it myself. How does a 80% ROI p.a. grab you, wabbit?
wabbit  
#6 Posted : Thursday, June 30, 2005 2:26:53 PM(UTC)
wabbit

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users, Subscribers, Unverified Users
Joined: 10/28/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,111
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 16 post(s)
[quote=indiscrete", analagous if I were to post the recipes for making bath-tub explosives or home-made listening devices on the Net, or wander into soup kitchen for the impoverished wearing a new suit. (Sorry I wanted better analogies - but I hope you get the idea?) Kudos to you for having a go, and I wish you (and everyone else) all the success in the world (send some of your success this way - I need it! :wink: ) Good luck, the new FY (in Oz) is upon us tomorrow, hope its just as good as the one just gone! wabbit :D
s1nbad  
#7 Posted : Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:56:40 PM(UTC)
s1nbad

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 5/31/2005(UTC)
Posts: 27
Location: sydney

good discussion. :D s1.
s1nbad  
#8 Posted : Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:58:04 PM(UTC)
s1nbad

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 5/31/2005(UTC)
Posts: 27
Location: sydney

2 minutes to the new trading year. Start your engines!
andreasrothe  
#9 Posted : Saturday, July 2, 2005 6:34:16 AM(UTC)
andreasrothe

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/25/2005(UTC)
Posts: 27

andreasrothe wrote:
Anybody ever tried coupling Metastock and Hyperorder (an automated order placement system? If so, could you please share how this is done, ie where does one enter the commands in Metastock, etc.
Does no answer to my original question mean nobody has tried Metastock and Hyperorder :?: :cry:
bearishbull  
#10 Posted : Saturday, July 2, 2005 8:58:42 AM(UTC)
bearishbull

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/30/2005(UTC)
Posts: 71

I use trade-this, www.trade-this.com for fully automatic trading. Wabbit, I think in this discussion you are totallt wrong!! Offcource most traders lose, this is because of the emotions they have. If you have a goog systeem and follow that, you can make goog profits, but as soon as the human being himself is controlling his system hey is going to do stupid things, like ignore stops and taking profit to fast. everyone trading his own style, mine is fully automatic and it's going pretty good. I think the automatic trading is the reason i'm still in the game. No emotions, no ignoring signals. If you have a system with I nice P&L equity curve over at least 2 years incl costs and slippage, you can make money. I'm a daytrader, don't do overnight positions. You talked about that daytraders can lose everything in seconds. With this you are wrong in my opinion. This is not for all daytraders. There is different kind of daytrading I'm hours in position so if the markets turns agains me sometimes it's ok, part of the game. The other kind of trader is the scalper, for him the seconds count, I used to be a scalper for a company in the euribor schatz futurespread..In this game you are right that you can lose in minutes. I something happens and you are not behind your screen you could be killed. In this spread a tick was at least 8000 euro's. This type of daytrading is not for me, this overleveraged trading. And think most daytraders here are not that kind of scalpers.
bearishbull  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:12:12 AM(UTC)
bearishbull

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Registered Users
Joined: 6/30/2005(UTC)
Posts: 71

Andreas, I am also busy trying things with hyperorder..How far are you now? I can make the trades go fully automatic now, but the problem is that if I start the expert it sends all the historical order to my broker as wel, cost much spreadcosts al that buy, sell, buy, sell..Do you know how to help this?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (Hidden)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.